Voter Satisfaction Log
    > General Discussion on Electronic Voting Machines
        > CalTech and M.I.T. Computer Experts -- Hacking the Machines
New Topic    Add Reply

<< Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
Author
Comment
Newswatcher
Unregistered User
(11/12/02 12:36 am)
Reply

CalTech and M.I.T. Computer Experts -- Hacking the Machines
A report by the combined computer experts at CalTech and MIT:

Sconcerns about the touchscreen machines, painting "A Provocative Scenario":

A programmer at SlickVotingMachines Corp. adds malicious code to a DRE (Direct Recording Electronic device) machine for the California 2004 Presidential election, so that every fiftieth vote for a Republican candidate is changed to a vote for the corresponding Democratic candidate. This only happens when the machine is in “real” mode as opposed to “test” mode, so the election officials never discover the fraud during their testing. The electronic audit trail made by the DRE machine is also affected, so “recounts” never discover anything amiss.

( web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr...eport2.pdf )

Marktheprogrammer
Unregistered User
(11/12/02 1:13 am)
Reply

NONE of the Techies Trust This Deal
The whole thing was hashed out on Slashdot
www.slashdot.org something like six months ago, around the primaries, and the general opinion was that *none* of all the techies who hang out there, and this is one of *the* most popular techie Web sites), liked or trusted this whole deal...since the company claimed that its code that actually ran the machines was 'trade secret", and so not open to public scrutiny. The issue from many years ago, of the mechanical voting machines that were fixed to alter the vote, was brought up.

I agree with the consensus, that calling this a "trade secret" is about as acceptable in a putative democratic republic is more than slightly suspect. For that matter, as a computer professional with over 20 years of experience in the field, I would venture to suggest that I
could rough out the code to add buttons pushed on a screen in an afternoon, and have a finished product within a week or two...and that's under 80 man-hours. Given that, I see nothing that they could possibly
*want* to be a trade secret...unless it was tweaked in illegal ways.

---
Mark
Unix/Linux systems administrator & software developer

stevenstevensteven
ezOP
Posts: 40
(11/12/02 1:20 am)
Reply

Re: NONE of the Techies Trust This Deal
I found Slashdot links at:

ask.slashdot.org/article....ad&tid=158

slashdot.org/article.pl?s...ead&tid=99

slashdot.org/article.pl?s...ad&tid=126

slashdot.org/article.pl?s...ad&tid=103

slashdot.org/article.pl?s...ad&tid=103

slashdot.org/article.pl?s...ad&tid=126

LouieBee
Unregistered User
(11/13/02 6:23 am)
Reply

I'm with you on this
What is so complicated about tallying up screen touches? The big problem I see with touch-screen voting is the elimination of a recount.
Touch-screen voting should generate either a punch card or optical scan ballot for subsequent processessing. The voter should be able to verify what he/she voted for. The generated hard-copy could then be placed in a ballot box and tabulated later. Recounts would then be possible.

ecoalex
Unregistered User
(2/11/03 10:02 pm)
Reply

voting machines
If integrity can be assured, voting machines can be better. Of course a "recount" must be available. The democratic process defines a civilization, to allow the process be controlled by vested intrests, and poof, no democracy, what we have now.

<< Prev Topic | Next Topic >>

Add Reply

Email This To a Friend Email This To a Friend
Topic Control Image Topic Commands
Click to receive email notification of replies Click to receive email notification of replies
Click to stop receiving email notification of replies Click to stop receiving email notification of replies
jump to:

- Voter Satisfaction Log - General Discussion on Electronic Voting Machines - VoteWatch Home -

Powered By ezboard® Ver. 7.32
Copyright ©1999-2007 ezboard, Inc.